Official releases
Since version 1.0, Django’s release numbering works as follows:
In Subversion, each Django release will be tagged under
tags/releases. If
it’s necessary to release a bug fix release or a security release that doesn’t
come from the trunk, we’ll copy that tag to
branches/releases to make the
bug fix release.
Major releases
Major releases (1.0, 2.0, etc.) will happen very infrequently (think “years”,
not “months”), and will probably represent major, sweeping changes to Django.
Minor releases
Minor release (1.1, 1.2, etc.) will happen roughly every nine months – see
release process, below for details.
These releases will contain new features, improvements to existing features, and
such. A minor release may deprecate certain features from previous releases. If a
feature in version
A.B is deprecated, it will continue to work in version
A.B+1. In version
A.B+2, use of the feature will raise a
DeprecationWarning but will continue to work. Version
A.B+3 will
remove the feature entirely.
So, for example, if we decided to remove a function that existed in Django 1.0:
Micro releases
Micro releases (1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.1.1, etc.) will be issued at least once half-way
between minor releases, and probably more often as needed.
These releases will be 100% compatible with the associated minor release, unless
this is impossible for security reasons. So the answer to “should I upgrade to
the latest micro release?” will always be “yes.”
Each minor release of Django will have a “release maintainer” appointed. This
person will be responsible for making sure that bug fixes are applied to both
trunk and the maintained micro-release branch. This person will also work with
the release manager to decide when to release the micro releases.
Supported versions
At any moment in time, Django’s developer team will support a set of releases to
varying levels:
As a concrete example, consider a moment in time halfway between the release of
Django 1.3 and 1.4. At this point in time:
Release process
Django uses a time-based release schedule, with minor (i.e. 1.1, 1.2, etc.)
releases every nine months, or more, depending on features.
After each release, and after a suitable cooling-off period of a few weeks, the
core development team will examine the landscape and announce a timeline for the
next release. Most releases will be scheduled in the 6-9 month range, but if we
have bigger features to development we might schedule a longer period to allow
for more ambitious work.
Release cycle
Each release cycle will be split into three periods, each lasting roughly
one-third of the cycle:
Phase one: feature proposal
The first phase of the release process will be devoted to figuring out what
features to include in the next version. This should include a good deal of
preliminary work on those features – working code trumps grand design.
At the end of part one, the core developers will propose a feature list for the
upcoming release. This will be broken into:
Anything that hasn’t got at least some work done by the end of the first third
isn’t eligible for the next release; a design alone isn’t sufficient.
Phase two: development
The second third of the release schedule is the “heads-down” working period.
Using the roadmap produced at the end of phase one, we’ll all work very hard to
get everything on it done.
Longer release schedules will likely spend more than a third of the time in this
phase.
At the end of phase two, any unfinished “maybe” features will be postponed until
the next release. Though it shouldn’t happen, any “must-have” features will
extend phase two, and thus postpone the final release.
Phase two will culminate with an alpha release.
Phase three: bugfixes
The last third of a release is spent fixing bugs – no new features will be
accepted during this time. We’ll release a beta release about halfway through,
and an rc complete with string freeze two weeks before the end of the schedule.
Bug-fix releases
After a minor release (e.g. 1.1), the previous release will go into bug-fix
mode.
A branch will be created of the form branches/releases/1.0.X to track
bug-fixes to the previous release. Critical bugs fixed on trunk must
also be fixed on the bug-fix branch; this means that commits need to cleanly
separate bug fixes from feature additions. The developer who commits a fix to
trunk will be responsible for also applying the fix to the current bug-fix
branch. Each bug-fix branch will have a maintainer who will work with the
committers to keep them honest on backporting bug fixes.
How this all fits together
Let’s look at a hypothetical example for how this all first together. Imagine,
if you will, a point about halfway between 1.1 and 1.2. At this point,
development will be happening in a bunch of places: